Make the call with a panel, not a prompt.
Nexus grounds a consequential question in live, cited evidence, convenes 8–32 independent model seats — drawn from a 50+ model roster — to argue it out adversarially, and returns one documented recommendation — with the assumptions, the risks, the confidence level, and the dissent preserved.
Free 30-day trial, no card · Professional $299/month · Enterprise from $20,000/year
From a plain-English question to a call you can defend.
Your decision, in plain English. Any language works — cases have run in Greek, Mandarin, Pitjantjatjara and French.
Discovery asks only the questions that actually change the answer — up to 13, never more.
Live, cited evidence gathered per angle — current facts, not model memory.
Independent seats — including a permanent devil’s advocate and risk officer — challenge every assumption.
One decisive call with conditions, confidence, and the minority view printed.
The human. Always.
Built so confident agreement can’t quietly be wrong.
Permanent adversarial seats
A devil’s advocate and a risk officer are structural — the Panel Architect can customize every other seat, but never remove the opposition. The panel argues because it’s built to.
Preserved dissent
When the panel splits — like the 10-to-9 ransomware split, or the reject vote one of our own models cast against us — the minority view and its reasoning are printed in the report, and confidence is capped honestly.
Evidence, classified
Claims in the report are labeled — verified, inferred, assumed, contradicted — so you can see exactly what the recommendation rests on and what would change it.
Watch it live
The War Room shows the real run as it happens: the research feed, every analyst seat by real model name, the challenges, and the confidence meter — through to the delivered report.
A report that leads with the answer.
Page one is the call — one decisive sentence in plain English, the panel vote, and the confidence level. Then what it rests on: the trade you’re making, the dominant risk, the conditions to meet, and the dissent. The full reasoning trail follows for anyone who wants to check the work.
Don’t take our word for it. Take the record.
The Buffett test
Given the 2008 Lehman rescue decision blind, the panel reached Buffett’s exact verdict — walk away, 10-to-1 — naming Repo 105 on the way.
Read the case → RIVAL REVIEWChatGPT ran a case
A rival AI drove an entire engagement as the client — then reviewed the output. Published word for word, criticism included.
Read the review → ANY LANGUAGEFour languages, one case
Submitted in Greek and Mandarin, clarified in Pitjantjatjara, finished in French — with the extraction provenance to prove real comprehension.
Read the case →Bring Nexus the decision you can’t take back.
Questions? alan@3dogs.ai · (702) 845-2886